The Inter-professional Collaboration
between University and Industry
1 Introduction
Historically,
universities were regarded as ivory tower since college professors used to
working in isolation from the surrounding environment to some degree. And the
major task of universities has been to do research and educate academics to students
(Alfares et al., 2005). However,
universities play a leading role in advancing the frontiers of science and
technology. So since the innovation and creativity becomes a key factor to
promote the economy, universities gradually have learned to be more involved in
the society. The research teams compose of highly educated specialists would be
increasingly crucial with challenging projects in collaboration with other
organizations (Gratton& Erickson, 2007).And to survive in the highly
competitive international situation, enterprises increasing recognize that to
achieve successful innovation, they cannot exclusively rely on their internal
R&D (Perkmann&Salter, 2012). The internal R&D cannot fulfill the
growing needs of innovation and creativity in the knowledge-based economy any
more. Also, creativity needs to involve a large number of people from different
disciplines working together to solve a great many problems (Catmull, 2008). While
working with external partners, such as universities, would allow them to access
different pools of knowledge and save R&D costs (Chesbrough, 2003).
The
topic of university-industry collaboration is not new, but since 1970s it has
become more system and formal. The university-industry collaboration is a
win-win situation to be beneficial to both parties because collaboration enables
organizations to achieve levels of performance and innovation far superior to what
any one person or unit could do alone (Tapscott et al., 2009).
For
universities, it is an opportunities to receive more tangible or intangible
resources to support the operation of research and develop their
commercialization. While for industry, the main benefit for enterprise from
this collaboration is that they can access to the latest research results and
innovation new methodologies. It can reduce enterprises’ costs and enhance
competitive advantage by creating core technology and business. What’s more,
judging from the entire society, university-industry collaboration makes more
innovation by upgrading knowledge and sharing experience and technology between
universities and industry.
2 Models of University-Industry Collaboration
Consultancy
and Technical services provision
It is a way to
provide information and technical services to industry by universities or research
center. Senior researcher or students from a university can be hired to consult
or work to provide some advice which is a key characteristic of a consultancy
instead of a written report to distinguish contract research.
Cooperative
R&D agreement
It is a kind of
agreement combine universities and industry. Universities provide personnel,
facilities and other resources with or without reimbursement. While industrial
parties offer funds, personnel, services, facilities, equipment in consistence
with the research mission.
Licensing
Licensing is a
measure to empower and authorize a third party to use exclusive or
non-exclusive intellectual property by transferring less-than-ownership rights.
Some small companies prefer to choose this measure. When an institution makes a
licensing agreement with a company, it means the invention can be commercialized
into the market.
Contract
research
It is a contract
to make the rules that industry provides funds during the process of research
and the universities provides brains with the schedule in a certain months or
years. The industry can utilize the unique capability of universities to create
commercial benefits through the contract research.
Spin-off
companies
Spin-off or
start-up companies are new companies which separate from the original
organization. During the spin-off process, there are the rights and knowledge
transfer happens.
3 Shifts in University-Industry Collaboration
3.1 A Shift from technology transfer to more disciplines
Although the University-Industry
collaboration used to be thought within the framework of technology transfer,
there are no compelling evidences to limit the collaboration only to technical
fields. According to development of economy, industry also imports resources from
social sciences and humanities such as global marketing and effective
organizational management to enhance the comparative advantages in the global
competition. Therefore, universities have begun to add social sciences and
humanities in the knowledge transfer initiatives. The organizational level
innovation support allows the professionals of knowledge transfer do not wait
for a disclosure to appear but instead they draw the scientists’ attention to
the issues that are relevant and important for the surrounding industry and
other external organizations.
In China, the
leading universities also have begun to make more collaboration in different
disciplines. In April, 2014, Guanghua School of Management, Peking University,
which is seemed as one of the best business school in Asia-Pacific area, has
made agreements with FAW-VW Audi to build
all-round university-industry collaboration. At the same time, Guanghua School
of Management and FAW-VW Audi would jointly set up “Audi Management Research
Center”, which is the first academic and research institution for domestic
luxury car, to explore new modes of university-industry collaboration in China and
boost social development by combining theoretical system from top business
school and practices from Audi. The “Audi Management Research Center” is a
platform for providing the case study of industry and enterprises development,
offering senior management training and building professional exchange
channels. At the same time, in order to deliver more talents for management to
multinational corporations, state-owned enterprises and private enterprises,
the two sides would set up a “FAW-VW Audi Scholarship” which can develop
Executive Education curriculum and make cooperative research EMBA business
case.
3.2 A shift to collaborate with
governments more closely
Since 1990s,
some government policies have sought to promote university-university
collaboration. Government organizations, local authorities and state
laboratories can jointly be considered as the third party that plays an active
part in the university-industry collaboration. It is notable that
university-industry collaboration has enjoyed all party support. The function of
the government is to offer society with public products and services and
non-profit public organizations and services that cannot be privatized. There
is the tendency that universities and industry want to seek more support from
government not only for the preferential policy but also for the timely and
accurate information. The public service platform, which are set up depending
on the university and regional research institute and information station are
formed by university and supported by the government, can be the university
science and technology park, business incubator, technology transfer center and
productive force promotion center. The three parts collaboration can create a
co-innovative environment combine with firms, government laboratories and
academic research groups for information exchange, R&D cooperation,
enterprise incubation and other technical services under the support of policy
and finance, such as the tax incentives and budgeting of funds.
The
local cooperation in Tsinghua University is one of the typical practices in
China which represent the frontier of technology innovation. Tsinghua’s
cooperation with provinces and municipalities started in the early 1980s. Based
on statistics at the end of 2013, Tsinghua has established cooperation with
more than 20 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions, and over 80
prefecture-level cities. Tsinghua’s collaboration with local government has
four ways. The first is combine local governments to open research projects
which are based on the local requirements, for example, In Tianjing,
Environment department in Tsinghua has been installed an emergency rescue
system to deal with environment pollution accidents, the Industrial Engineering
Department has designed a developmental plan for the logistics industry for
chemical products in the industrial bases adjacent, while the Economics and
Management School has involved in the research of the role, scale and
development modal of CBD in Binhai New Area. The second is to set up
cooperation funds with local authorities to serve national and regional
economic development in Wuxi, Hebei, Yunnan, Guangdong, etc. The third is establish
a series of research institutes with several economically developed regions,
including the Pearl River Delta Region, the Yangtze River Delta Region and the
Bohai Sea Region. The last one is open cooperation office in key regions, such
as Suzhou, Wuxi and Changzhou. The main duties of the offices are to provide
customized technology services, send experts to have in-depth surveys of present
conditions and future potential of the enterprises and support the local
government in strategic planning in view of the specific conditions of the
regions.
4 Factors to Improve the Development of University-Industry
Collaboration
4.1 Social & Economical Driver
Globalization
The
globalization often links to the integrated financial systems, tariffs, trade
rules and transnational economic networks and the force of globalization have
provided for extraordinary growth (DeGioia, 2011). Globalization is both an
opportunity and challenge. No matter for university or industry, they do not
only compete within domestic any more, international and cross-cultural business
and knowledge transfer has become more and more common.
Knowledge-based
economy
It
is not a new idea that knowledge plays an important role in the economy (OECD,
1996). With fuller recognition of the role of knowledge and technology in
economic growth which be regarded as the external influences on production, some
scientists define today as a knowledge-based economy. In knowledge-based
economy, economic activities rely not only on natural resources but also on
intellectual resources like know-how and expertise. In recent growth theory,
knowledge could increase returns on investment, which can in turn benefit for
the accumulation of knowledge. So with the important position of knowledge,
there is no doubt that the enterprises suffer highly stress from competition in
seeking advanced knowledge and information technology. Therefore, the
university-industry collaboration in various disciplines would satisfy the
strong demands in new knowledge and technology.
4.2 Knowledge Driver
Innovation
Lam (2005)
mentions that in the knowledge-based economy, universities are now considered
as important players in economic process that support national competitiveness
and innovation. Open innovation seems to be a key area of opportunity for every
country. There are some evidence shows the tendency that companies are looking
beyond their organizational boundaries to get knowledge. As illustrated in Figure
1, the term open innovation has
increasingly used in academic literature, as well as search volume in Google
(Figure 2). Therefore, with the increasing demands in innovation, the core
activities universities are needed to broad into new area. Open innovation not
only the sharing of ideas but needs to make close collaboration between
multiple stakeholders in facing a business opportunities and challenges. It is
a key element to use collaboration to harness the creative abilities of
stakeholders, for example scientists, universities, businesses, skilled
workers, government and other institutions.
Figure
1 Academic papers on open innovation (Dahlander&Gann,
2010)
Figure
2 Google search volume on open innovation
(Google trends analysis)
Knowledge
management
The open
innovation needs organizations to sharing knowledge through collaboration. Knowledge
management is defined as the process of creating, acquiring, sharing and
managing knowledge to augment individual and organizational performance (Heathfield,
2009). During the process of university-industry collaboration, technology and knowledge
transfer would generate multiple kinds of knowledge and resources in one institution
n or even in a department. So it is how to manage the various kinds of
knowledge is increasingly essential for organizational success. Knowledge
includes explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge. Compared with the company
documents, policies, database and books, much of the intellectual capital of an
organization is not written down anywhere but resides in people’s minds
(Denning, 2004). With the development of enterprises and society, it is
important to make human capital management for employees from industry and
researchers and scientists.
5 Issues in the process of University-Industry Collaboration
University and
industry are two different social entities with different business models, thus
leading to the significant differences and conflicts in their nature and
objectives of activities. Culture differences can influence business negotiations
in significant and unexpected ways (Sebenius, 2002). It is obviously that the
core interest of both is different either. When they collaborate, each party
would hold certain expectations for the other side. The table shows some
dissimilarities which create friction between the two entities and limit their collaboration.
Table
Differences between university and industry
There are four
factors to cause the conflict in organizations, namely group identification,
differences in power, status and culture, competition over scarce resources and
ambiguity over jurisdiction. The gaps between university and industry could
also be move round the four parts.
5.1 Culture
differences in university-industry collaboration
One of the most
important barriers is the culture difference which permeates every corner in university-industry
collaboration, such as stakeholders have different norms, standards and values
under diverse organizational environments (Siegel, 2003). Enterprises in
industry usually do not want to publish the results of research and share
information with colleagues and the general public. Instead, they treat
technology as the one should be kept its proprietary and used for strategic
advantage in profit seeking. In industry, people tend to regard their
scientific and technological research and products as proprietary resources.
While from the perspective of university, they believe that the ownership of
knowledge in scientific activities is not belonged to private, but to the
public (Diedonck, 1990). On the other hand, the relationship between university
and industry is cooperation in most of the time rather than integration. And it
is harder to make balance between university and industry in terms of the existence
of culture differences. So there is no doubt that the collaboration has the
weaknesses in group identification.
5.2 Argument in
intellectual property rights
Issues on the
ownership of the intellectual property rights are also make tensions between
university and industry (Cyert&Goodman, 1997). Intellectual property is one
of the scarce resources that refer to creations of the mind, such as
inventions, designs, symbols, names and images. Because of the
university-industry collaboration, research and innovations are often worked
together by both sides. So the affiliation and resource investment make it
harder to identify which party should have the ownership of the intellectual
property rights. Universities could want to protect proprietary rights of
inventions even before the beginning of collaboration. However, it is difficult
to acquire such kind of rights in terms of a long term process and high cost.
As pointed out by Siegel (2003), intellectual property right issues are an
insurmountable barrier in some cases to make hard line negotiations since
universities are too aggressive in exercising intellectual property rights.
5.3 Time in
research
Time is the
other barrier for university and industry. The academic researchers always
provide themselves with several years to accomplish a research subject, while
industrialist often thinks in terms of months. From universities perspective,
they are idea-oriented to do scientific research with the aim of innovation and
invention. But for the industry, which is product-centered, profit and efficiency
is the primary objective.
Reference
Alfares, H.,
Jaber, A., Bubshait, A., Al-Swailem, O., Said, S. (2005). University-Industry/Business
Interaction: KFUPM Experience
Catmull, E.
(2008). How Pixar Fosters Collective Creativity. Harvard Business
Chesbrough, H.
(2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From
Technology. Harvard Business
Cyert, R. M.,
and Goodman, P. S. (1997). Creating Effective University-Industry Alliances: An
Organizational Learning Perspective. Organizational Dynamics, pp. 45-57
Dahlander, L.
and Gann, D.M. (2010). How open is innovation?. Research Policy 39(6): 699-709
DeGioia, J.
(2011). The Impact of Globalization and the Future University
Denning, S.
(2004). Telling Tales. Harvard Business
Heathfield, S.
(2009).Leveraging HR and Knowledge Management in a Challenging Economy. HR Magazine
Lam, A. (2005). Work
roles and careers of R&D scientists in network organizations. Industrial
Relations, 44, 42–75
Leathard, A.
(1994). Going inter-professional: working together for health and welfare.
Routledge
Liu, H., and
Jiang, Y. (2001). Technology transfer from higher education institutions to
industry in China: nature and implications. Technovation, 21 pp. 175–188
Gratton, L.,
Erickson, T. (2007). 8 ways to build collaborative teams, Harvard Business Review
OECD. (1996).
The Knowledge-based Economy. Paris, OECD
Perkmann, M.,
Salter, A. (2012). How to Create Productive Partnerships with Universities. MITSloan
Schartinger, D.,
Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., and Frohlich, J. (2002) Knowledge interactions
between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and
determinants. Research Policy 31, pp.303-328.
Sebenius, J.
(2002). The Hidden Challenge of Cross-Border Negotiations. Harvard Business.
Siegel, D. S.,
D., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., and Link, A. N. (2003) Commercial knowledge
transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of
university–industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management
Research 14, pp. 111–133.
Tapscott, D,
Erickson, T., Gratton, L., Cross, R., Capek, F. (2009). Building the
Collaborative Enterprise: Ten Questions to Ask about Business Opportunities
through Collaboration. nGenera
Corporation.
Vedovello, C.
(1998) Firms’ R&D Activity and Intensity and the University–Enterprise
Partnerships. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 58, pp. 215–226.
|